Demo · 01
Experts Discussion
Like a real team: multidisciplinary experts discuss your problem, grounded in our knowledge or in yours.
In an Experts Discussion you assemble a panel and pose a problem; each expert speaks in turn, grounded in the corpus that backs them. Reformulating a coating for a marine environment, for example, you might convene a corrosion expert, a polymer expert, and a coatings expert from our roster — and add two custom experts you've built yourself: one seeded with your current manufacturing-process capabilities, the other with your pricing and procurement data. The session mixes published external knowledge with the internal data only your team holds.
Your data is account-tied, not used to train models, deletable on request. See /data-handling.
How this demo works
- Approach
- A turn-taking panel of experts, each grounded in its own source material.
- Deterministic vs generative
- Before each turn, relevant passages are pulled from that expert's own source material; the expert then speaks to what was found, in its own voice. The substance comes from the material — pre-curated by us for the standard experts, or supplied by you for the ones you create.
- Human review fit
- The discussion runs to completion among the experts — you don't intervene mid-flow. At the end you receive a report: key insights, points of agreement and disagreement, and the source passages each turn drew on, so the substance is auditable.